Nonprofit law
Perlman & Perlman
  SPRING 2010


Issues and Trends
Joint Cost Allocations Increasingly Applied to New Media Formats

More nonprofits are allocating the joint costs of fundraising and program activities conducted in newer media formats, such as websites, where the fundraising activities are conducted in conjunction with program activities, management activities, or both.  In the past, allocation of joint costs was largely applied to more traditional fundraising media formats such as direct mail. 

Joint costs allocation is allowed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountant’s (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) 98-2, which establishes financial accounting standards for allocating the costs of joint activities.  SOP 98-2 states that joints costs in which fundraising is only a part of the purpose of certain activities can be allocated to fundraising, management and program expenses.  For example, a non-profit that sends out a letter that asks for a donation but also educates the public on issues related to the non-profit's exempt purpose can allocate the costs associated with the letter to both fundraising and program expenses (assuming public education is an exempt function of the charity.)  These allocations can also be made to the cost of telephone solicitation, telethons, special events and now – new media.

The SOP provides guidance on how to functionally allocate joint costs associated with multi-purpose activities such as the cost of the postage for this type of mailing, or as which cannot directly be allocated to one of these functions, such as the postage for a mailing or, as described above the costs associated with a letter of this type.  The SOP guidelines are important as the IRS requires tax-exempt organizations to disclose in their Form 990 whether they allocate joint costs, and if so, whether they are complying with SOP 98-2.

This firm has seen the IRS, state regulators, and charity watchdogs take a keen interest in organizations’ allocation of joint costs as part of their review or investigation processes because they believe monitoring the proper allocation of joint costs is critical to ensuring that organizations are fairly stating their respective fundraising, program, and management/administrative costs.  Regulators and watchdogs generally pay closer to organizations joint cost allocations when more than half of the total joint costs have been allocated to program costs. 

Although many organizations are generally aware that they can allocate joint costs of fundraising activities, they are often unfamiliar with the preliminary criteria that must be met in order to allocate joint costs, or they do not know how to properly apply the rules set forth in SOP 98-2.  If your organization has questions relating to its allocation of joint costs, please contact Karen Chang at karen@perlmanandperlman.com.

 



 
Back to Newsletter
 
In The News
· Are Non-Profits' Real Estate Tax Exemptions at Risk? 
· IRS Issues "Dirty Dozen" List of Tax Scams
· Bankruptcy Trustee Seeks to Invalidate $8.1 million Donation to Yale
· Notable State Legislation
 
Issues and Trends
·
Joint Cost Allocations Increasingly Applied to New Media
· Altruism and Compassion in Economic Systems Conference
 
Recommended Resources
·
IRS Issues Guidance and Clarification on New Form 990



 
©2009 Perlman & Perlman. All Rights Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Hudson Fusion
Office Locations